Hillary Spoke About Reproductive Justice In A Truly Intersectional Way

WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton’s first speech since she won a majority of pledged delegates in the Democratic presidential race included remarks about how abortion relates to other issues. That’s groundbreaking for a presidential nominee.

The term “reproductive justice” was promoted by the grassroots women of colouring collective SisterSong in the 1990 s to describe “the complete physical, mental, spiritual, political, social, and economic well-being” of a person. This entails considering a broad array of factors that affect a person’s ability to have , not have and/ or create children.

At a Planned Parenthood Action Fund membership event on Friday, Clinton discussed restrictions on abortion access and state and federal-level attempts to defund Planned Parenthood. She reiterated her commitment to repealing the Hyde Amendment, which prevents Medicaid from funding abortions for low-income women. And she noted that the Supreme Court is set to rule by the end of June on laws passed by the GOP-controlled Texas legislature that would leave the nation with 10 or fewer abortion clinics — and could lead to closed clinics in other states.

“For too long, issues like these have been rejected by many as’ women’s issues’- as though that somehow builds them less worthy, secondary, ” Clinton said. “Well, yes, these are women’s issues. They’re also household issues. They’re economic issues. They’re justice issues. They’re fundamental to our country and our future.”

Then, she noted that reproductive rights are inextricable from other progressive priorities, like raising the minimum wage, passing comprehensive immigration reform and equal pay statutes, preventing gun violence and challenging systemic racism.

“All the questions we’re talking about today are connected, ” she said. “They intersect. And that’s why I’m grateful to the reproductive justice leaders in this room and across America. Because you know that all those issues go straight to that fundamental question: whether we believe women and families of all races and backgrounds and income levels deserve an equal shooting in life.”

Clinton’s speech was a powerful reminder that the concept of “choice” is hollow for low-income people who may not actually have a selection when it comes to discontinuing their pregnancies because they can’t afford an abortion.

“Let’s repeal laws like the Hyde Amendment that make it nearly impossible for low-income females — disproportionately women of colouring — to exert their full reproductive rights, ” she said.

Alex Wong/ Getty Images
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton with Cecile Richards, president of thePlanned Parenthood Federation of America, onJune 10, 2016 in Washington.

The Democratic Party platform advocated for access to abortion “regardless of ability to pay” in 2012, but reproductive justice advocates have had trouble persuading Democrats to expend the political capital necessary to push for the Hyde Amendment’s repeal in a Republican-controlled Congress.

Clinton also noted the hypocrisy of Republicans who would simultaneously force pregnancy upon women who do not want to remain pregnant while resisting guaranteed paid household leave and policies that would help reduce unintended pregnancy in the first place. The United States is the only developed country in the world that does not guarantee some period of paid family leave for new parents.

“Have you ever “ve noticed that” the same politicians who are against sex education, family planning and safe and legal abortion are also against policies that would make it easier to raise a child — like paid household leave? ” she asked.

A big portion of Clinton’s speech was dedicated to assaulting the GOP’s presumptive nominee, Donald Trump, for his misogyny and for his promise to defund Planned Parenthood and appoint Supreme court justices who would support overturning Roe v. Wade, the landmark decision that decriminalize abortion.

But what may ultimately be more significant is that Clinton showed how a high-level, mainstream Democrat can unapologetically explain why repealing the Hyde Amendment matters, even when Republicans will unavoidably assault her for supporting “taxpayer-funded abortion” in the general election.

Read more: www.huffingtonpost.com